Eduventures-Summit-2022

Eduventures Summit 2022

June 15-17, 2022

Boston, MA

The Early Application Games: Optional or Essential?

by | Apr 12, 2022 | All Topics, Traditional Student Demand

The Early Application Games: Optional or Essential?

Early application to college has gone from a good option for students who really know what they want, to a strategic play for those who are trying to increase their odds of getting into a college. But these strategic moves— enticed by institutions and eagerly pursued by students—are not without consequences for the enrollment environment.

Prior to the pandemic, in 2019, NACAC reported that 25% of colleges offered “early decision,” where a student makes a commitment to enroll in an institution and withdraws from consideration at other institutions. Indications are that early decision and its cousin, “early action,” have only increased over the course of the pandemic. This has reshaped college decisions and policymakers are taking note.

Early Application, Early Action, and the Pandemic

Before diving into a discussion on this topic, we should note that in addition to early decision, an even larger number of schools in 2019 (38%) offered early action, where the student is not committed to enroll at the institution or to withdraw from consideration at other institutions. The significant difference for the institution is that yield from early decision applicants is very high (90%) while yield from early action is practically equivalent to regular decision (25%).

Our Prospective Student Research™ tracked the percentage of early appliers across the pandemic years. In our case, we are simply looking at whether a student has applied to an institution, regardless of whether the application is considered early decision, early action, or some other application program that allows students to apply prior to typical regular admissions deadlines. While we can interpret the data to include students who would fall across all of these categories, we’ve nevertheless seen a clear and continuous rise in early appliers from 2019 to 2021 (Figure 1).

 

Percent of Students Who Apply to College Early 2019 to 2021Figure 1.

 

In 2019, the total percentage of early appliers in our sample was 4%. With students in the highest family income bracket applying early at the highest rates (6%) and first-generation college students applying early at the lowest rates (3%). But the pandemic lit a fire under students to apply early, nearly tripling the percentage of students applying early to college by 2021 in which the total population average was 11%.

In all three years, high-income students led the way in early applications, but with significantly more early applications (17% in 2021 vs. just 6% in 2019). Conversely, first-generation students had the lowest early application rates in 2021—although, they too applied with much greater frequency (10% in 2021 vs. 3% in 2019).

More importantly, perhaps, is the growing disparity between students in their interests or abilities to apply early to colleges. In 2019, the range from the lowest early appliers and the highest in 2019 was a mere 2%. In 2021 that range has widened to 7%.

This underscores the great concern of early decisions: that it is for the privileged student who can afford to make a commitment without having to worry about financial support from a college. Students who need to comparison shop for the best financial aid package are discouraged from applying early decision. Therefore, colleges who accept early decision students have little incentive to be generous with financial aid.

According to The National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC), in 2019, 6% of applicants were early decision. Of these, 61% were admitted, and the yield rate was 90%. This nets out to an average of about 3% of an institution’s class being filled with early decision students.

Surely, given more recent changes in student behavior, these numbers have changed in this timeframe, too. We should expect to see a larger percentage of institutions offering early decision and larger percentages of institutions’ classes being filled with early decision students. What might that percentage be? Certainly, more than 3%. As high as 10%?

If early decision is the province of the wealthy, then what safeguards are institutions taking to protect access to enrollment for those who are less able to apply early decision because of financial considerations? Institutions don’t want to have a first class (early decision) and steerage (regular decision division).

This is where policymakers are beginning to take heed. The New York State legislature has proposed a bill, the Fair College Admissions Act, that would ban both legacy admissions and early decision in public and private institutions in the state, identifying these programs as drivers of inequality in higher education. Institutions in this state, and perhaps in others down the road, may run the risk of legislative action unless they do something to make early decision accessible to all students—not just those who can pay full tuition.

The Bottom Line

Early decision is fundamentally different than what it was originally intended for, to give the few students with certainty about their choice a premium admissions experience. It’s now become something that many students consider a crucial part of maximizing their chances of getting into college. Institutions should consider the intended purpose of early decision programs—beyond enrollment numbers and revenue—and refine their programs to fit the needs of the many students they serve.

In reviewing your early decision policies, consider the following questions:

  • Which students are applying early decision, and which are not? Is this mix accomplishing your institutional goals?
  • Can you make early decision accessible to more students? How can you ensure that financial aid packages are healthy, and swiftly and well communicated to students? How can you ensure that early decision students have equitable access to financial aid?
  • What percentage of your class will you fill with early decision students and how does it impact opportunities for regular decision students who might not have the luxury of early decision?
  • To what degree should you be using early decision vs. early action?

Has your early decision program fundamentally changed over time? If so, what do you want early decision to be for your institution?

Never Miss Your Wake-Up Call


Learn more about our team of expert research analysts here.

Like, Follow, Share.

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

Recent Posts

Kim Reid

Eduventures Principal Analyst at Encoura
Contact

Pandemic-Proof Your Enrollment Strategy with Admitted Student Research

This recruitment cycle challenged the creativity of enrollment teams as they were forced to recreate the entire enrollment experience online. The challenge for this spring will be getting proximate to admitted students by replicating new-found practices to increase yield through the summer’s extended enrollment cycle.

By participating in the Eduventures Admitted Student Research, your office will gain actionable insights on:

  • Nationwide benchmarks for yield outcomes
  • Changes in the decision-making behaviors of incoming freshmen that impact recruiting
  • Gaps between how your institution was perceived and your actual institution identity
  • Regional and national competitive shifts in the wake of the post-COVID-19 environment
  • Competitiveness of your updated financial aid model

Also in Traditional Student Demand

Never Miss Your Wake-Up Call


Learn more about our team of expert research analysts here.